Free Harmonic Derating Screening Calculator for Generators & Transformers – Enter % Nonlinear Load

This article presents a free harmonic derating screening calculator concept for generators and transformers operation

It explains standards, calculation methods, example workflows, and practical mitigation strategies for nonlinear loads applications

Harmonic Derating Screening Calculator for Generators and Transformers (Nonlinear Load Input)

Equipment type Select equipment type Power transformer Synchronous generator

Rated apparent power (kVA)

Nonlinear load share at maximum loading (%)

Current THDi of nonlinear load (%)

Advanced options

Planned operating load (kVA)

Nominal system voltage (kV line-to-line)

Harmonic loss weighting factor Kh (dimensionless)

Allowable thermal loading factor HF_limit (p.u.)

You may upload a clear nameplate or single-line diagram photo so an AI assistant can suggest reasonable input values.

📷 Rellenar datos con foto IA

⚡ More electrical calculators Reiniciar Copiar Compartir

Enter rated kVA, nonlinear share and THDi to obtain a harmonic derating factor.

🧠 Explicar mi resultado 🔍 Revisar mis datos

Calculation method (screening approximation):

• Nonlinear load share (fraction): f_nl = Nonlinear load share (%) / 100
• Effective system current THDi due to nonlinear share: THDi_sys (%) = THDi_nl (%) × f_nl
• Harmonic loss weighting factor: Kh = user input, or typical default (≈ 1.0 for transformers, ≈ 1.2 for generators)
• Distortion factor including weighting: DF = sqrt[ 1 + Kh × (THDi_sys / 100)^2 ] (dimensionless)
• Allowable thermal loading factor: HF_limit = user input (p.u.), typically 1.0
• Maximum loading fraction versus nameplate: f_max = sqrt(HF_limit) / DF (dimensionless, limited to 1.0)
• Recommended derated apparent power: S_derated = S_rated × f_max (kVA)
• If a planned operating load S_planned is provided: utilisation ratio = S_planned / S_derated (dimensionless). Values above 1.0 indicate that the planned load exceeds the recommended harmonic-derated capacity.

Note: This is a simplified thermal screening method assuming that additional losses scale with the square of the effective harmonic current. For detailed design, a full harmonic study and manufacturer-specific thermal model should be used.

Load type	Typical nonlinear share (%)	Typical THDi of nonlinear load (%)	Indicative Kh
Office IT / servers with PFC supplies	40–80	10–25	1.0
Drives (six-pulse VSDs) without filters	50–90	35–80	1.1–1.3
Data centres with active filtering	60–90	5–15	1.0
Generators feeding mixed nonlinear loads	30–70	15–40	1.2–1.4

Q1. What does the harmonic derating factor represent?
It represents the maximum recommended loading of the generator or transformer, expressed as a fraction of its nameplate kVA, so that estimated thermal stress due to current harmonics does not exceed the selected limit.

Q2. Why is the nonlinear load share needed?
Only the nonlinear portion of the load contributes significant harmonic currents. The effective system THDi is approximated from the nonlinear share and the THDi of that nonlinear portion, which strongly influences the derating.

Q3. How should I choose the Kh and HF_limit advanced parameters?
Use Kh ≈ 1.0 for standard transformers and Kh ≈ 1.2–1.4 for generators or equipment known to be more sensitive to harmonics. HF_limit = 1.0 is typical when you want to keep thermal loading within nameplate limits; lower values can be used for conservative design.

Q4. When is a detailed harmonic study recommended instead of this screening?
A detailed study is recommended when high-value assets are involved, when THDi is above roughly 40–50 %, when multiple harmonic sources interact, or when manufacturer-specific derating curves and standards (e.g. IEEE/IEC) must be strictly followed.

Background and standards context for harmonic derating

Harmonic currents from nonlinear loads create additional heating and stress on rotating machines and power transformers. Standards and guides define measurement methods, limits, and how to translate spectral currents into derating or K-factor requirements. Key references include IEEE and IEC documents that the screening calculator must reference when assessing compliance and capacity. This article describes the calculation methodology, typical input spectra for common loads, formulas used by manufacturers, worked examples, and practical mitigation. Engineers can use the screening procedure to quickly identify when a detailed thermal/finite-element analysis is required and when simple derating suffices.

Fundamental harmonic theory and thermal equivalence

Harmonics are integer multiples of the system fundamental frequency (e.g., 50 Hz or 60 Hz). When a conductor or transformer winding carries harmonic currents, heating is driven by two main phenomena:

• I2R losses: resistive heating increases with the square of the RMS current at each harmonic.
• Frequency-dependent losses: eddy current and core losses increase with frequency, roughly proportional to h2 or higher orders depending on material and geometry.

Engineers use an equivalent heating current (I_eq) and a K-factor to quantify the combined heating effect of a discrete harmonic spectrum and to determine derating.

Key formulas (expressed in plain HTML)

Total RMS line current:

I_rms = √(Σ_h=1ⁿ I_h²)

K-factor (transformer/manufacturer definition):

K = Σ_h=1ⁿ (I_h/I₁)² × h²

Equivalent heating current:

I_eq = √(Σ_h=1ⁿ I_h² × h²) = I₁ × √K

Transformer allowable continuous fundamental current when derated for harmonics:

I_allow = I_nameplate / √K

Percent derating required:

Variable explanations and typical input values

• I_h — RMS current magnitude of harmonic order h (A). Typical values provided in tables below as a percentage of I₁ (fundamental current).
• I₁ — Fundamental RMS current (A). Example: for a 400 V, 500 kVA transformer, I₁ ≈ 720 A line current at 400 V three-phase (I = S / (√3 × V)).
• K — Dimensionless heating factor used by transformer manufacturers; K <= 1 indicates no extra heating relative to sine, K > 1 indicates increased heating.
• I_eq — Equivalent heating current (A) reflecting combined harmonic heating effect.
• h — Harmonic order (integer): 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, ...

Typical I_h/I₁ ranges are provided in the next tables for common converter types; use these as conservative screening inputs when measured data are not available.

Typical harmonic spectra for common nonlinear sources

Notes: - The table values are conservative, typical engineering estimates for screening. Real measured spectra must be used for final design. - For 6-pulse rectifiers, the dominant orders are h = 6k ± 1 (5th, 7th, 11th, 13th, ...). For 12-pulse converters, harmonic amplitudes are significantly reduced for lower orders.

Transformer derating guidance and lookup

Many transformer manufacturers and IEEE guide C57.110 specify how K-factor maps to derating. The following table provides commonly used reference points for quick screening. For safety, apply the conservative end of ranges unless manufacturer-specified curves are available. Interpretation: - I_allow = 1 / √K × I_nameplate. The "Allowable percent" column is 100 × 1/√K. - If the required continuous load exceeds I_allow, either increase transformer size, choose a K-rated transformer manufactured for that K-factor, or mitigate harmonics.

Generator screening considerations

Generators are affected differently from transformers. Harmonic currents can increase stator copper losses, cause rotor heating through harmonic-induced flux, and produce torque pulsations and shaft torsional stresses. Standards to consult include:

• IEC 60034-1 (ratings of rotating electrical machines)
• IEEE Std 519 (system harmonic limits)
• Manufacturer application notes (e.g., Caterpillar, Cummins, Siemens) for generator derating under nonsinusoidal loads

Key generator screening principles: - Calculate equivalent heating current I_eq for stator copper heating using the same Σ I_h² × h² approach as a conservative screening. - Check manufacturer guidance: some manufacturers publish acceptable harmonic spectra at different load factors or provide stator heating correction factors. - Assess excitation system interaction: harmonics can create additional losses in rotor circuits and can impact AVR stability—consult manufacturer for rotor heating correction.

Screening calculator algorithm and step-by-step procedure

A practical free screening calculator implements the following steps:

1. Input fundamental system frequency, rated voltage, and nameplate currents for transformer/generator.
2. Obtain harmonic spectrum: measured I_h values or use conservative typical spectra by load type.
3. Compute I_rms = √(Σ I_h²).
4. Compute K = Σ (I_h/I₁)² × h².
5. Compute I_eq = I₁ × √K.
6. For transformers: compute I_allow = I_nameplate / √K and Derating% = 100 × (1 − 1/√K).
7. For generators: compare I_eq against available stator rating and consult OEM guidance for rotor heating; apply conservative derating similar to transformers unless OEM data indicates otherwise.
8. Report whether immediate mitigation is required, and show recommended actions: filtering, transformer upsizing, K-rated transformer, or generator oversizing.

Implementation notes and tolerances

• Use measured harmonic currents when available; screening with assumed spectra is conservative but may overestimate derating.
• Include interharmonics and DC offset contributions when using rectifier front-ends with unsymmetrical loads—these can increase heating.
• Round K and currents to appropriate significant digits for reporting; include a safety margin (e.g., +10% to I_eq) for screening if measurement uncertainty exists.

Worked example 1 — Transformer feeding a 6-pulse rectifier (complete)

Scenario: - 500 kVA, 400 V three-phase transformer, nameplate line current I_nameplate = 500000 VA / (√3 × 400 V) = 721.69 A → round to 722 A. - Nonlinear load: 6-pulse rectifier supplying a DC load. Measured/load-assumed fundamental current I₁ = 600 A (load draws less than transformer rating). - Measured harmonic spectrum (RMS) or conservative typical values as a percent of I₁: - 5th: 25% → I5 = 0.25 × 600 = 150 A - 7th: 12% → I7 = 0.12 × 600 = 72 A - 11th: 8% → I11 = 48 A - 13th: 5% → I13 = 30 A - 17th: 3% → I17 = 18 A - 19th: 2% → I19 = 12 A - Higher orders negligible for screening. Step 1 — Compute I_rms (total RMS current): I_rms = √(I₁² + I5² + I7² + I11² + I13² + I17² + I19²) = √(600² + 150² + 72² + 48² + 30² + 18² + 12²) = √(360000 + 22500 + 5184 + 2304 + 900 + 324 + 144) = √(390356) ≈ 625.04 A Step 2 — Compute K: K = Σ (I_h/I₁)² × h² Compute term-by-term: - h=1: (I1/I1)² × 1² = 1 × 1 = 1.000 - h=5: (150/600)² × 25 = (0.25)² × 25 = 0.0625 × 25 = 1.5625 - h=7: (72/600)² × 49 = (0.12)² × 49 = 0.0144 × 49 = 0.7056 - h=11: (48/600)² × 121 = (0.08)² × 121 = 0.0064 × 121 = 0.7744 - h=13: (30/600)² × 169 = (0.05)² × 169 = 0.0025 × 169 = 0.4225 - h=17: (18/600)² × 289 = (0.03)² × 289 = 0.0009 × 289 = 0.2601 - h=19: (12/600)² × 361 = (0.02)² × 361 = 0.0004 × 361 = 0.1444 Sum K = 1.000 + 1.5625 + 0.7056 + 0.7744 + 0.4225 + 0.2601 + 0.1444 = 4.8695 ≈ 4.87 Step 3 — Compute I_eq: I_eq = I₁ × √K = 600 × √4.8695 ≈ 600 × 2.206 ≈ 1,323.6 A Step 4 — Derating for transformer: I_allow = I_nameplate / √K = 722 / 2.206 ≈ 327.3 A Interpretation: - The nominal transformer can carry 722 A for a sinusoidal load but with this harmonic spectrum its allowable continuous fundamental current to avoid overheating is approximately 327 A. - The actual fundamental load current is 600 A (per the scenario), far exceeding I_allow, so this transformer would require significant derating: Derating% = 100 × (1 − 1/√K) = 100 × (1 − 1/2.206) ≈ 54.7%. - Actions: upsizing transformer to match I_eq, select a K-rated transformer designed for K ≈ 5, or install harmonic mitigation (12-pulse conversion, active front end, or filters) to reduce harmonic amplitudes. Notes: - This screening yields a very high K (~4.87) because of large 5th and 11th harmonics. Using a 12-pulse rectifier or active filtering can reduce K significantly.

Worked example 2 — 2 MW generator supplying a mixed nonlinear load (complete)

Scenario: - 2.0 MW, 11 kV synchronous generator; rated line current I_nameplate = S / (√3 × V) = 2,000,000 VA / (√3 × 11,000 V) ≈ 105.0 A. - The generator supplies a plant with many VFDs and UPS units. Measured harmonic spectrum per phase (RMS) expressed as percent of I₁ (measured I₁ = 90 A operating load per phase): - 1: 100% - 3: 4% → 3.6 A - 5: 10% → 9.0 A - 7: 6% → 5.4 A - 11: 3% → 2.7 A - 13: 2% → 1.8 A - Higher orders total 2% → 1.8 A Step 1 — Compute I_rms: I_rms = √(90² + 3.6² + 9.0² + 5.4² + 2.7² + 1.8² + 1.8²) = √(8100 + 12.96 + 81 + 29.16 + 7.29 + 3.24 + 3.24) = √(8236.89) ≈ 90.77 A Step 2 — Compute K: K terms: - h=1: 1.000 - h=3: (3.6/90)² × 9 = (0.04)² × 9 = 0.0016 × 9 = 0.0144 - h=5: (9/90)² × 25 = (0.10)² × 25 = 0.01 × 25 = 0.25 - h=7: (5.4/90)² × 49 = (0.06)² × 49 = 0.0036 × 49 = 0.1764 - h=11: (2.7/90)² × 121 = (0.03)² × 121 = 0.0009 × 121 = 0.1089 - h=13: (1.8/90)² × 169 = (0.02)² × 169 = 0.0004 × 169 = 0.0676 - higher orders aggregated: (1.8/90)² × average h² (conservatively use h=25 squared=625) = (0.02)² × 625 = 0.0004 × 625 = 0.25 (this is conservative aggregation) Sum K ≈ 1 + 0.0144 + 0.25 + 0.1764 + 0.1089 + 0.0676 + 0.25 = 1.8673 ≈ 1.87 Step 3 — Compute I_eq: I_eq = I₁ × √K = 90 × √1.8673 ≈ 90 × 1.366 ≈ 122.94 A Step 4 — Generator screening and interpretation: - The generator nameplate current is 105 A. The equivalent heating current per phase is 123 A, exceeding nameplate by ≈ 17.1 A (≈16.6% higher). - This indicates additional heating and potential derating required. For conservative design, derate the generator capacity by the ratio I_eq/I_nameplate = 123 / 105 ≈ 1.17 → require ~17% larger generator or reduce harmonics. - Additionally consult OEM: rotor heating and excitation system should be checked; for K ≈ 1.87, many manufacturers recommend further analysis and possibly derating. Recommended actions: - Reduce harmonic content via line reactors, passive filters, or active front-ends to lower I_eq. - If mitigation not possible, oversize generator by at least 20% or select generator with specifications allowing operation with these harmonic levels.

Practical mitigation strategies and design recommendations

When screening indicates unacceptable derating, consider the following mitigation hierarchy:

1. Reduce harmonic generation at the source:
   • Upgrade 6-pulse rectifiers to 12-pulse architecture or use multi-pulse rectification.
   • Use active front-end (AFE) converters for sensitive loads.
   • Install DC-link, passive smoothing, or synchronous rectification where applicable.
2. Install harmonic filters:
   • Detuned (tuned) passive filters for dominant harmonic orders.
   • Broadband passive filters or active harmonic filters for variable spectra.
   • Advantages/constraints: passive filters require design for resonance avoidance with system impedance; active filters provide dynamic compensation but are costlier.
3. Use K-rated transformers or transformers with higher thermal margins:
   • K-rated transformers have specific construction to handle harmonic heating.
   • Consider transformer oversizing by a factor approximating √K to avoid derating.
4. Generator strategies:
   • Oversize prime mover/generator set to accommodate I_eq derived heating.
   • Consult OEM for rotor/stator heating curves and AVR stability under harmonic load.
   • Employ islanding and selective load shedding where possible to reduce peaks.

Measurement, data quality, and implementation tips

• Use high-resolution harmonic analyzers or power quality meters capable of individual harmonic current measurement up to at least the 50th order for comprehensive screening.
• Sample in steady-state load conditions and record multiple points: minimum, typical, and maximum load states.
• Include load diversity: multiple nonlinear loads operating simultaneously can create interharmonics and different spectra than single-device tests.
• When using assumed spectra, adopt a conservative approach and document assumptions for traceability.

Normative references and further reading

• IEEE Std 519-2014 — Recommended Practice and Requirements for Harmonic Control in Electric Power Systems. See: https://standards.ieee.org/standard/519-2014.html
• IEEE C57.110-2018 — Guide for Establishing Transformer Capability When Supplying Nonsinusoidal Load Currents. See: https://standards.ieee.org/standard/C57_110-2018.html
• IEC 61000-3-6 — Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) — Limits for harmonic current emissions (industrial equipment). See: https://www.iec.ch/
• Caterpillar/Cummins generator application notes — example resources: Cummins "Generator and Harmonics" whitepapers provide practical vendor guidance (search vendor PDFs for your OEM).
• Manufacturer papers: ABB, Siemens, Schneider Electric application notes on "Transformers for Non-linear Loads" and "Harmonic Mitigation Techniques". Example: https://www.abb.com/

Final technical recommendations and screening deliverables

For an effective free screening calculator result package, produce:

• A short executive summary indicating whether immediate mitigation is required.
• Detailed harmonic spectrum table and plots (if measured), indicating each I_h and percent of fundamental.
• Calculated values: I_rms, K, I_eq, I_allow, and recommended derating percentage.
• Recommended mitigation options with estimated cost/benefit (filtering, upsizing, or K-rated transformers).
• References to standards and OEM consultation notes for final design verification.

Use the screening calculator as a fast, conservative decision-support tool. It flags potentially harmful harmonic environments and quantifies a thermal-equivalent current so engineers can prioritize detailed thermal modeling, manufacturer consultation, or remedial actions. References (authority links):

• IEEE Std 519-2014 — https://standards.ieee.org/standard/519-2014.html
• IEEE C57.110 Guide — https://standards.ieee.org/standard/C57_110-2018.html
• IEC family (general) — https://www.iec.ch/standards
• ABB application notes (search "transformer harmonic heating") — https://new.abb.com/
• Cummins whitepapers on power quality and generator sizing — https://www.cummins.com/

Ensure final installations use measured data, OEM consultation, and, where appropriate, thermal simulation or factory tests. The formulas and procedures provided allow a robust screening capability for engineers designing or assessing systems supplying nonlinear loads.