Calculation of A260/A280 Ratio for Nucleic Acid Purity

The A260/A280 ratio is crucial for evaluating nucleic acid purity in molecular biology laboratories.
This guide explains the ratio’s calculation, offering formulas, reference tables, examples, and expert interpretations.

A260/A280 Ratio Calculator

Common A260/A280 Ratio Values for Nucleic Acids

The table below displays the most commonly observed A260/A280 ratios for DNA and RNA samples along with their purity implications. These reference values are derived from empirical data in accordance with the current laboratory best practices.

Sample TypeA260/A280 RatioPurity AssessmentPossible Contaminants
Pure DNA~1.8Ideal for molecular biology protocolsLow contamination
Pure RNA~2.0High purity for transcription assaysLow contamination
< 1.6LowSignificant protein contaminationProteins, phenol, guanidine
1.6 – 1.7Sub-optimalMild protein contaminationResidual proteins
> 2.1HighPossible RNA contamination in DNARNA, phenol, ethanol
~1.5 (ssDNA)AcceptableSingle-stranded DNALess ideal for PCR
> 2.2QuestionableContamination or measurement errorSolvent, buffer interference

Note: Consistent results require clean cuvettes, calibrated spectrophotometers, and proper blanking with the elution buffer.

Formulas Used for A260/A280 Ratio Calculation

1. Core Equation

The absorbance ratio is calculated using:

Where:

Instrumental Considerations:

  • Measurements are taken using a UV-Vis spectrophotometer or microvolume platforms like NanoDrop™.
  • Use quartz cuvettes for accuracy if not using microvolume tech.

2. Nucleic Acid Concentration Formulas

For Double-Stranded DNA (dsDNA):

For RNA:

For Single-Stranded DNA (ssDNA):

For Oligonucleotides:

Ensure dilution factor is included if applicable:

Explanation of Key Variables

Common Reference Standards and Normative Sources

The purity thresholds and interpretation of the A260/A280 ratio are supported by:

Real-World Example #1: DNA Extraction from Blood

Scenario: A researcher extracts genomic DNA from peripheral blood using a silica column protocol and measures:

Step-by-step calculation:

  1. Calculate A260/A280:
  1. Concentration:
  1. Interpretation:
  • The A260/A280 ratio of 1.83 is close to the ideal 1.8, indicating pure DNA.
  • Concentration is within usable range for PCR and gel electrophoresis.
  1. Action:
  • Sample is considered acceptable for downstream genotyping and PCR protocols.

Real-World Example #2: RNA Extraction from Plant Tissue

Scenario: A molecular biologist extracts total RNA from Arabidopsis thaliana leaves using TRIzol™ reagent and measures:

Step-by-step calculation:

  1. Calculate A260/A280:
  1. RNA Concentration (undiluted):
  1. Adjusted for Dilution:
  1. Interpretation:
  • A260/A280 of 2.10 suggests high-purity RNA, slightly above ideal (2.0), but acceptable.
  • Could indicate traces of phenol, common in TRIzol protocols.
  • The high concentration is optimal for reverse transcription or RNA-seq.
  1. Action:
  • Sample may be treated with an additional ethanol precipitation step if downstream sensitivity to phenol is a concern.

Best Practices to Ensure Reliable A260/A280 Measurements

Accurate measurement of A260/A280 ratios is contingent on rigorous lab technique. Follow these guidelines:

Do:

  • Use RNAse/DNAse-free consumables
  • Blank the instrument with the same buffer used in elution
  • Measure triplicates and take average
  • Keep samples free from bubbles, fingerprints, or residual solvents

Avoid:

  • Measuring too diluted samples (A260 < 0.1) – signal-to-noise is too low
  • Using plastic cuvettes for UV – they absorb at 260 nm
  • Failing to account for dilution factor – leads to underestimation

Factors Affecting the A260/A280 Ratio

FactorImpactMitigation Strategy
Phenol contaminationArtificially raises 260 and 280, may skew ratioUse phenol-free methods or purification
Protein contaminationIncreases A280, lowers the ratioProteinase K treatment
Buffer interferenceSome buffers (Tris, EDTA) absorb in UV rangeUse water or compatible low-UV buffers
RNA contamination in DNAIncreases A260, causes ratio > 2.0Treat DNA with RNase A
Dirty cuvettes or tipsCreates random absorbance artifactsClean with ethanol or replace
Light path inconsistencyResults in fluctuating readingsUse consistent volume and calibrated optics

Interpreting Unusual A260/A280 Ratios

Sometimes ratios fall outside the expected ranges, and understanding their meaning is critical.

Ratio RangeLikely MeaningRecommended Action
< 1.5High protein contaminationRe-extract or treat with proteinase
1.6–1.7Partial contamination or degraded sampleUse cautiously or re-purify
1.8–2.0Pure DNA/RNAAcceptable for most applications
> 2.1Possible RNA in DNA, or phenol contaminationTreat with RNase or re-purify via column
> 2.2Measurement error or severe contaminationRepeat measurement with blank calibration

Integration into Modern Molecular Workflows

The A260/A280 ratio is not a standalone indicator. Combine it with:

  • A260/A230 ratio (ideal ~2.0–2.2): detects carbohydrate, phenol, or guanidine contamination
  • RNA Integrity Number (RIN) from Bioanalyzer: ensures transcript quality
  • Fluorometric methods (e.g., Qubit™): provide accurate quantification

For clinical labs and biobanks, compliance with ISO 20387:2018 and OECD Guidelines recommends dual metrics: A260/A280 and integrity assays for nucleic acid quality assurance.

Useful Online Resources

Summary Table: A260/A280 Ideal Values by Application

ApplicationSample TypeIdeal A260/A280Comments
PCR/GenotypingDNA~1.8Must be free of protein and phenol
Reverse Transcription (RT)RNA~2.0Integrity is more critical than purity
Microarray or RNA-seqRNA≥ 2.0Also check RIN > 7
Cloning/TransformationPlasmid DNA1.8–2.0Ensure absence of RNA contamination
qPCR (SYBR/Probe)RNA/DNA~1.8–2.0Confirm no inhibitors (salts, proteins)
Protein expression (DNA template)DNA1.7–1.9Best with highly pure dsDNA